4 ms·
How is it that your interpretation of this evidence is so different to not only Zimmer's summary, but also all of the people quoted in the article? I think you
by yetanotherphd 13y ago
How is it that your interpretation of this evidence is so different to not only Zimmer's summary, but also all of the people quoted in the article? I think you would be more convincing if you addressed why these people interpreted the results so differently to you, than simply claiming that Zimmer has overlooked something.
- tokenadult 13y agoYou're reading into my statement above something I didn't say.
- yetanotherphd 13y agoOK, but you are still claiming that the correct interpretation of this evidence is very different to everyone in the article. Given that the facts you describe are very well known and basic, I doubt the people are unaware of them. They may, for example be using a measure of genetic difference that works better for distinguishing between groups.