4 ms·
I'm talking about the time period before security screening started at most airports... when hijackings were common. Look at the 50s-70s. An attack on an airp
by wtvanhest 13y ago
I'm talking about the time period before security screening started at most airports... when hijackings were common. Look at the 50s-70s.
An attack on an airplane is simply too challenging for the vast majority of people to execute.
It is currently difficult to execute. It won't be if we had no security.
Search for "Security screening" on this wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_detector http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_detector
You will notice that they were rolled out in the 70s as security screening started at airports. It was proven effective and unless you can make an argument why people wouldn't pose security threats now with no security checkpoints you won't convince any actual decision maker anywhere.
- prof_hobart 13y agoFrom that list :- 50s - none involving America. 60s - 5. 70s - 14 (3 of which, as far as I can tell with any fatalities). However, I'm not really arguing against zero security at airports. What I'm arguing against is the ludicrous increase in security procedures since 9/11. >It is currently difficult to execute. It won't be if we had no security It's not difficult to execute bombings on trains, and they are hugely impactful when it happens. Yet they rarely happen. You seem to be ignoring this.