The grammar does not inspire confidence. And the near-immediate mention of employees being restricted to work activities by employers, before moving on to actua

The grammar does not inspire confidence. And the near-immediate mention of employees being restricted to work activities by employers, before moving on to actual censorship of civil society, doesn't help with taking the page seriously. If we were going to really list enemies of internet freedom, the list must include practically all governments - almost all practice some surveillance and most suppress at least a few categories of communications (nods to DoctorZeus on this page). Corporate power is another major enemy. In any country where the law doesn't protect internet neutrality, pretty soon citizens will be limited to a shrinking set of sites unless they pay extra to remove artificial blockages.