Argh... I'm saying the phrasing is unclear. Bad communication. If you don't reinvest in any deals then that should be mentioned clearly in the FAQ. Right now i

Argh... I'm saying the phrasing is unclear. Bad communication. If you don't reinvest in any deals then that should be mentioned clearly in the FAQ. Right now it isn't. Second example: > Will you consider my business if we are later stage (higher valuation)? Answer: > Kima15’s standard offer allows us to make decisions and close investments very quickly but we realise [sic] that not all companies will be at this specific stage so we also continue to accept submissions via Kima Ventures This implies that yes, you do invest at a later stage. But the next sentence goes: > We do still only invest at the earliest stages... Which implies the opposite: that only early stage investments are an option. So although I like the idea of Kima15, some extra proofreading wouldn't hurt.