3 ms·
Legally speaking, they technically need to. This is why the landowner is liable for damages to a trespasser unless a no trespassing sign is up.
by smileysteve 13y ago
Legally speaking, they technically need to. This is why the landowner is liable for damages to a trespasser unless a no trespassing sign is up.
- mikeash 13y agoAbsolutely not. The question of liability is a completely different one. Just because you can be liable doesn't mean they have the right to be there. If I leave a stack of $100 bills sitting in front of my door and you take them, that is theft and you can be prosecuted and I most certainly have the right to complain about it, even if I really should have kept it more securely.