Microsoft put in the deprecated warnings long before C11. Thanks for pointing out that they were made part of C11. It's a little amusing that MS have this opti

Microsoft put in the deprecated warnings long before C11. Thanks for pointing out that they were made part of C11. It's a little amusing that MS have this optional part of C11 implemented years in advance and standardised on their work, but haven't got C99 support. It must suit them to have it that way. Can you tell me whether the C11 Bounds checking stuff from this optional Annex K had fully made it in to GCC 4.9? If not what's missing? On the status page here it implies the project has had issues:[0] [0]http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/C11Status http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/C11Status Yet, on the release notes it says "Substantially complete" but it's really as clear as mud whether it's all there[2]. [2]http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html I suppose that on Linux and Windows the intel compiler relies on the GCC/MS implementation of memcpy_s.