8 ms·

...but that's how the free market works. It genuinely baffles me that people might think of something's being socially worthless, but commercially valuable as

by rosser 13y ago

...but that's how the free market works. It genuinely baffles me that people might think of something's being socially worthless, but commercially valuable as a feature.

na85 13y ago
I guess you attach some positive connotation to the word "feature"? e.g. Apple products have a lot of features that I find stupid, but that doesn't mean they're not features. Socially worthless or not, that's how the world works. I'm not trying to be a corporate cheerleader. It is what it is.
- surrealize 13y ago
  We, as a polity, control the rules of the system in which all this stuff happens. If the system we've built exhibits behaviors that we find undesirable, then we can change the rules. For example, pollution is an activity which is often commercially valuable (in that polluting can help a factory produce a given product without paying the costs of mitigating the pollution). But it's socially undesirable, and we restrict it. We don't just throw up our hands and say, "well, it's commercially valuable, that's how the free market works, I guess we just have to breathe brown air".
  - PavlovsCat 13y ago
    "Somebody is saying this is inevitable - and whenever you hear somebody saying that, it's very likely to be a set of businesses campaigning to make it true." -- Richard Stallman "Futilism is futile." -- Imade Thatup
  - jamesbritt 13y ago
    But I think the difference here is between being socially neutral (or worthless) and socially detrimental.
  - smsm42 13y ago
    No we do not control the rules. Quoting Antoine de Saint-Exupéry: "If I ordered a general to fly from one flower to another like a butterfly, or to write a tragic drama, or to change himself into a sea bird, and if the general did not carry out the order that he had received, which one of us would be in the wrong?" the king demanded. "The general, or myself?" You can not just wish any rules and laws of human or physical nature. You can tell people to fly like butterflies, but when they do not, your anger at them would be misdirected. If you try to act as if there are no rules except ones you invent, you, not unlike many socialists that imagine they can ignore the laws of nature, are in for a lot of unpleasant surprises. You can blame the evil capitalists - just like Venezuelan government, having mismanaged the country for years to the point they have now shortage of toilet paper (why is it always the toilet paper? that basic thing has some very bad luck with socialists) now blames the capitalists and hidden enemies. But that won't do you any good, as it doesn't do any good for them. Until you recognize the rules of the system is not purely under your control, you won't get very far.
    - glesica 13y ago
      So the economy, as it is currently constituted, is the one, single way in which things could be arranged and if they were arranged in any other fashion the whole society would implode and we'd run out of toilet paper? Is that your contention? Because if it isn't, then you have to admit that we can make some changes to the system. Reasonable people might disagree as to the type and extent of changes that would "work", but they would all agree that some sort of changes would improve things. In other words, there are things the general could be ordered to do that would not be absurd or impossible for a general to accomplish, like marching around in shiny shoes, or invading another country. Quoting a French dude doesn't make your argument better, it just helps illustrate how little you thought about your words before hitting "reply".
      - smsm42 13y ago
        >>> Is that your contention? No, it's not. Repeating for those who TLDR the pervious comment: you can not just invent any rules you like. There exist rules that are there regardless of your desires. I hope you see the difference between this and "is the one, single way in which things could be arranged". >>> we can make some changes to the system Of course we can. We just need to understand we can not make any changes but just some and in certain ways, and those some changes have to be done right. People can fly. You just need to follow certain rules and do certain tricks. If you try to fly without following those rules, you may die or be badly hurt. So may a society if it tries to make changes without following the rules. >>> Quoting a French dude doesn't make your argument better, I would advise you to familiarize yourself with who the "French dude" is. That would make your life richer and your understanding of the world fuller. It would also hopefully make you understand why I quoted him.
jjdro 13y ago
It's not a bug, it's a feature!
dinkumthinkum 13y ago
I don't know if it is a feature ... I mean ... money talks. (I know we are all altruists here though :) )
phyalow 13y ago
It genuinely baffles me that you may think otherwise?
snowwrestler 13y ago
Socially worthwhile things have a cost. Commercially valuable things create wealth. You can't have one without the other.

by rosser 13y ago

...but that's how the free market works. It genuinely baffles me that people might think of something's being socially worthless, but commercially valuable as a feature.

na85 13y ago

I guess you attach some positive connotation to the word "feature"? e.g. Apple products have a lot of features that I find stupid, but that doesn't mean they're not features. Socially worthless or not, that's how the world works. I'm not trying to be a corporate cheerleader. It is what it is.

surrealize 13y ago
We, as a polity, control the rules of the system in which all this stuff happens. If the system we've built exhibits behaviors that we find undesirable, then we can change the rules. For example, pollution is an activity which is often commercially valuable (in that polluting can help a factory produce a given product without paying the costs of mitigating the pollution). But it's socially undesirable, and we restrict it. We don't just throw up our hands and say, "well, it's commercially valuable, that's how the free market works, I guess we just have to breathe brown air".
- PavlovsCat 13y ago
  "Somebody is saying this is inevitable - and whenever you hear somebody saying that, it's very likely to be a set of businesses campaigning to make it true." -- Richard Stallman "Futilism is futile." -- Imade Thatup
- jamesbritt 13y ago
  But I think the difference here is between being socially neutral (or worthless) and socially detrimental.
- smsm42 13y ago
  No we do not control the rules. Quoting Antoine de Saint-Exupéry: "If I ordered a general to fly from one flower to another like a butterfly, or to write a tragic drama, or to change himself into a sea bird, and if the general did not carry out the order that he had received, which one of us would be in the wrong?" the king demanded. "The general, or myself?" You can not just wish any rules and laws of human or physical nature. You can tell people to fly like butterflies, but when they do not, your anger at them would be misdirected. If you try to act as if there are no rules except ones you invent, you, not unlike many socialists that imagine they can ignore the laws of nature, are in for a lot of unpleasant surprises. You can blame the evil capitalists - just like Venezuelan government, having mismanaged the country for years to the point they have now shortage of toilet paper (why is it always the toilet paper? that basic thing has some very bad luck with socialists) now blames the capitalists and hidden enemies. But that won't do you any good, as it doesn't do any good for them. Until you recognize the rules of the system is not purely under your control, you won't get very far.
  - glesica 13y ago
    So the economy, as it is currently constituted, is the one, single way in which things could be arranged and if they were arranged in any other fashion the whole society would implode and we'd run out of toilet paper? Is that your contention? Because if it isn't, then you have to admit that we can make some changes to the system. Reasonable people might disagree as to the type and extent of changes that would "work", but they would all agree that some sort of changes would improve things. In other words, there are things the general could be ordered to do that would not be absurd or impossible for a general to accomplish, like marching around in shiny shoes, or invading another country. Quoting a French dude doesn't make your argument better, it just helps illustrate how little you thought about your words before hitting "reply".
    - smsm42 13y ago
      >>> Is that your contention? No, it's not. Repeating for those who TLDR the pervious comment: you can not just invent any rules you like. There exist rules that are there regardless of your desires. I hope you see the difference between this and "is the one, single way in which things could be arranged". >>> we can make some changes to the system Of course we can. We just need to understand we can not make any changes but just some and in certain ways, and those some changes have to be done right. People can fly. You just need to follow certain rules and do certain tricks. If you try to fly without following those rules, you may die or be badly hurt. So may a society if it tries to make changes without following the rules. >>> Quoting a French dude doesn't make your argument better, I would advise you to familiarize yourself with who the "French dude" is. That would make your life richer and your understanding of the world fuller. It would also hopefully make you understand why I quoted him.

jjdro 13y ago

It's not a bug, it's a feature!

dinkumthinkum 13y ago

I don't know if it is a feature ... I mean ... money talks. (I know we are all altruists here though :) )

phyalow 13y ago

It genuinely baffles me that you may think otherwise?

snowwrestler 13y ago

Socially worthwhile things have a cost. Commercially valuable things create wealth. You can't have one without the other.