3 ms·
Seriously, try loading the page with NoScript, and you get nothing. Apparently, it needed nearly a megabyte of JavaScript (somehow managing to make Firefox unre
by ANTSANTS 13y ago
Seriously, try loading the page with NoScript, and you get nothing. Apparently, it needed nearly a megabyte of JavaScript (somehow managing to make Firefox unresponsive for a several seconds on every page load) to asynchronously load a 600 word plain text article.
Not the author's fault (apart from choosing to use Blogger), but wow, how do you fuck web design up that badly? It's just a blog, a few paragraphs and links to more articles, it doesn't need to be an entire fucking web app complete with 5 other useless ways to view a list of summaries (Pinterest is big right now, people love grids, right? Here, let me smack you in the face with this stupid zooming JQuery effect).
- dmix 13y agoIt's funny because "degrade gracefully" was the standard for a very long time as javascript blew up in popularity. Now the pioneer of JS apps doesn't even bother trying to put <noscript>There is usually a blog post here if you are using javascript</noscript>
- AsymetricCom 13y agoand I don't bother to use such sites. I think I can pass up this content.