If the 30% isn't considered bonus (which is quite a big bonus) then it doesn't make sense to me. If I wanted to jeopardize 30% of my salary and take risks, I w

If the 30% isn't considered bonus (which is quite a big bonus) then it doesn't make sense to me. If I wanted to jeopardize 30% of my salary and take risks, I would start my own company. Running a company involve taking risks that are generally only shared among the investors. For this reason, I'm sure we're either missing details or the 70% is equal to around 90% of the industry salary which would be more acceptable, 10% off the base salary in exchange of 30% bonus, which would get you to 120%.