3 ms·
Is that "for no reason that I'm aware of", or "for no reason that she's aware of"? (I'm pretty confident that there's a reason, even if it turns out not to be a
by philh 13y ago
Is that "for no reason that I'm aware of", or "for no reason that she's aware of"? (I'm pretty confident that there's a reason, even if it turns out not to be a good one.)
> This has happened before, she gets targeted for her great work in trying to balance gender equality in tech.
It sounds like you're implying a causal relationship between these two clauses, i.e. it has happened before because she gets targeted for her work. But the link posted in this thread suggests no such relationship.
- DaveSapien 13y agook, ok. for no good reason then. These things happen because she gets targeted for her work. She's not a troll baiter at all, but still gets carry on like this from time to time.
- philh 13y agoYou haven't answered my questions. > for no good reason then. Are you not aware of a reason (but maybe she knows something you don't), or is she not aware of a reason, or are you aware of a reason and it's not a good one? (I'm not asking because I expect there to be a good reason. But e.g. if twitter has told @girlgeeks what's going on, and you just aren't privy to those communications, then that's very different to the situation where twitter hasn't told @girlgeeks what's going on.) > These things happen because she gets targeted for her work. Cite? The information in this thread so far is that this has happened once before for unrelated reasons.