4 ms·
Moto G 2/3 of the price? Nexus 5 for $50 more? It doesn't have to be a "music player" of sorts, when the iPod touch is an iPhone without the phone part. So as l
by salient 13y ago
Moto G 2/3 of the price? Nexus 5 for $50 more? It doesn't have to be a "music player" of sorts, when the iPod touch is an iPhone without the phone part. So as long as there are decent Android phones out there with the same specs, that's the alternative. You could buy a Moto G and never use it as a phone if you don't want to.
- TillE 13y agoHow's the headphone jack on those devices? I've had terrible experiences with Android devices in that respect, including the Galaxy Nexus. Unusable in a matter of weeks, whereas my iPods have always had rock solid connections even after years of abuse.
- Pxtl 13y agoI've a Samsung-based phone where the headset-jack (it has a mic, it's a headset-jack not headphone-jack) has taken years of abuse and still going strong. Jogging with an armband and using it in bed and getting snagged and clipping it to the jogging stroller and subsequently forgetting I was tethered when I step away.... none of that did damage. My phone is a Samsung Focus, which came out a year before the G-Nex. I'm surprised the G-Nex gave you so much trouble.
- kllrnohj 13y agoYou are a bit mistaken on the price differences. The 16GB iPod Touch is $230. The 16GB Moto G is $200 and the 16GB Nexus 5 is $350. The $300 iPod Touch is 32GB, which is $100 less than the equivalent storage size N5 (and there stops being a Moto G at this point). So if you have an extra $100 you could get an N5 instead of an iPod Touch - or you could spend that extra $100 to get a 64GB iPod touch.
- Pxtl 13y agoYes, but the Moto G isn't being marketed for that - consumers don't even know that usage is possible. Unadvertised features don't exist.