4 ms·

> That's great and all, but in a newsroom, when the editor changes your title, they tell you why so you can do better next time. I agree that would be nice. Ho

> That's great and all, but in a newsroom, when the editor changes your title, they tell you why so you can do better next time. I agree that would be nice. However, as you know from running a busy site, it's not always possible to give such feedback, or you'd drown under emails. I'm thinking of /r/redditrequest or any of the methods of reporting things like doxxing to the mods, which usually don't get any feedback for the user. My interest is this: I think content needs to be edited for maximal reading potential. That in turn leads to the question as to whether Reddit/HN are more like links lists (MetaFilter, blogs) or more like discussion forums (phpBB, vbulletin, etc). By "more like" I mean as communities, not as software.

jedberg 13y ago
You know how we avoided this problem at reddit? We didn't edit the user's submissions. :)
- amerika_blog 13y ago
  I understand, but for devil's advocacy sake, that leads to other problems for the content reader, such as: * Duplicates. Endless duplicates. * Rejection of good content because the headline is bad. * Essentially outsourcing this function to subreddit mods, who have only rejection at hand. If someone mods a subreddit, and they see a submission that's perfect except the person misspelled "intimacy" in the title, they have two options only: * Accept it as it is. * Reject/delete it and get the user to submit again. There's a bit of high overhead there, and less of a powerful experience for the reader. I think that matters less with Reddit's mostly 15-25 audience but is more important here.