The author appears to confuse a democratically-run government with a democratic form of anarchy. Maybe this is for marketing reasons, because he ought to know t

The author appears to confuse a democratically-run government with a democratic form of anarchy. Maybe this is for marketing reasons, because he ought to know the difference between the two. In any case, the press reviews completely fail to notice this, as you'd expect. It's important for us to remember which of the two is being described here, because they are diametrically opposed in many ways.