3 ms·
The beauty of OpenSCAD never ceases to amaze me .. minkowski as a built-in? http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/Transformations#minkowski http://
by fit2rule 13y ago
The beauty of OpenSCAD never ceases to amaze me .. minkowski as a built-in?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/Transformations#minkowski http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/Transforma...
Wow, its just so .. elegant ..
- Timmmmbob 13y agoMaybe, but it of limited use for most CAD problems - "standard" visual sketch-and-extrude systems are MUCH easier to use for 99% of things you'd want to model. Exceptions are highly repetitive and mathematical objects like gears, CNC art, fasteners and so on.
- iamwil 13y agoOpenSCAD is pretty good for programmers transitioning into 3D modeling. The minkowski can get slow for high triangle counts, so it's not used too often. But it's as a result of relying on the underlying 3D graphics library, CGAL.