4 ms·
I never even contemplated the size of cookies before seeing this. It never occurred to me that it could create such an overhead. It'd be incredibly handy if we
by adriancooney 13y ago
I never even contemplated the size of cookies before seeing this. It never occurred to me that it could create such an overhead. It'd be incredibly handy if we could set a header like `x-send-cookies: NO` to stop the browser sending cookies along for static content. Great post, a real eye opener.
- maaaats 13y agoHere as well. I knew of several reasons to serve static content from a different domain/cdn, but never thought of this cookie-benefit.
- reddiric 13y agoSet a header where (on which request from whom to whom?)
- dnissley 13y agoThe initial request from browser to server, I presume.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]