4 ms·

That's right. 5400BTC is stated. Blockchain has been tracked, and first estimate was around https://blockchain.info/address/1EiVHZnDVjFH6Tic1YmWUSfYmVUnUZdnMU

That's right. 5400BTC is stated. Blockchain has been tracked, and first estimate was around https://blockchain.info/address/1EiVHZnDVjFH6Tic1YmWUSfYmVUnUZdnMU https://blockchain.info/address/1EiVHZnDVjFH6Tic1YmWUSfYmVUn... And then another blockchain was tracked. (the 90m one) And transactions all end all being chopped up, and redistriuted, with the largest amounts going into wallets like this: https://blockchain.info/nl/address/1P7hjN2J119r2MoT14PwnvtNkvohScS3zi https://blockchain.info/nl/address/1P7hjN2J119r2MoT14PwnvtNk... This

judk 13y ago
Is blockchain.info set up as an effective store of consensus around tracking "evil" addresses? If not, is anyone else doing that (publicly)? I am sure the NSA and cousins are studying the blockchain carefully.
- easy_rider 13y ago
  Well, I don't own BTC myself, am not in the BTC community and I'm not NSA even :) But judging by what the internets says. Yeah, this seems to be the the case in the BTC community to monitor and track suspicious activity. I've also seen a 00666 BTC transaction being used as a community effort to mark the blockchain. The number in the amount should need no further elaboration for the intention. That