6 ms·

http://www.amazon.com/primeair http://www.amazon.com/primeair When will I be able to choose Prime Air as a delivery option? A: We hope the FAA's rules will be

• 27182818284 13y ago
  >We hope the FAA's rules will be in place as early as sometime in 2015 Well, it is carefully crafted to say the rules will be in place, not the technology. The FAA could say Amazon needs to do X first where X is any one of the challenges you mentioned. I'm glad they put that in, though, because otherwise the threads are always full of "The FAA will never allow this" comments. The wording gives me a reassuring feeling that Amazon knows how much hard work it will take to accomplish.
  • scotth 13y ago
    > We will be ready at that time. Except for, you know, that bit (the bit you cut out)
    • 27182818284 13y ago
      Holy crap, you're right. My eyes skipped completely over that. I wasn't trying to be a jerk or anything. Upvotes for you, shame for me.
• javert 13y ago
  Well, you know, Bezos is a pretty smart guy. So maybe he knows something about this technology that the rest of us don't. Maybe he has an upper hand over the current state-of-the-art.
  • crusso 13y ago
    Or maybe he's just orchestrating a little extra PR for Amazon on 60 minutes?
    • enraged_camel 13y ago
      I have no particular love for Bezos - last I heard, Amazon sucks as a workplace - but this seems unlikely. There are better ways to drive PR than reveal one of your company's secret projects to the public.
    • mrpdaemon 13y ago
      Or he wants to create public demand for this service to use as leverage for getting the regulations through.
  • scotth 13y ago
    Yeah, right. The privileged information available only to the mega-rich...pfft.
    • tesseractive 13y ago
      Or advances in the available technology driven by a great R&D team with a significant budget instead of hobbyists? I don't want to knock hobbyists, because they often do great work. But if Amazon thinks this is the future of package delivery, they could bring an awful lot of resources to bear on the problem.
    • javert 13y ago
      Bezos has access to massive R&D resources because he created massive value for consumers. Now, those resources can be leveraged to generate even more value for consumers.
• maxerickson 13y ago
  Having to have several sets of batteries seems like on of the simpler problems to deal with.
  • ryankuykendall 13y ago
    Why not just put the battery in the payload lid?
• sbierwagen 13y ago
  Battery recharge time - out for 15 mins flight? Recharge for 2 hours. Short trips to/from a fixed distribution point is the canonical use case for battery swapping in electric vehicles.
  • scoot 13y ago
    It is, but keep in mind that for weight efficiency the LiPo batteries are only protected by a heat-shrink skin, no physical or fire protection at all. They will spontaneously combust quite robustly in a crash, or during charging of they are faulty or have been stressed in flight. So they have to be charged in a fire safe manner, and (in a commercial setting such as a distribution centre) away from the main facility. Not beyond possibility, and again with changes in battery technology this will improve (LiFo is looking hopeful relative to LiPoon the safety front), but another logistical hurdle, so still worth mentioning.
  • reustle 13y ago
    In a city, it would be awesome to see automated rooftop drone charging systems (solar powered of course).
• raghus 13y ago
  Amazon's page reads like a Google April 1st post. Or maybe someday we'll look back at these comments like we do at http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/ http://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/
  • Aloha 13y ago
    How right, so very very right you are. Quoted from the thread you linked. "Raise your hand if you have iTunes ... Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ... Raise your hand if you have both ... Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ... There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod. ~LoudMusic -- No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!"
    • Tzunamitom 13y ago
      I love this one, could be written today... Apple is being distroyed by the rumors that are being created. When they announce that they are going to have a new product, everyone thinks it's going to blow their worlds. Rumors start flooding in about even the most outragous products ( I even heard a few "sources" mention teleportion) This is getting plain stupid. Apple is a normal company. Why does the public constantly expect them do the impossible?
  • zone411 13y ago
    Actually, these comments are not as discredited as one might think in hindsight. iPod sales weren't spectacular until the 4th generation of the iPod classic and until iPod Mini was introduced 3 years later. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/Ipod_sales_per_quarter.svg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/Ipod_sale... I think it's valuable to point out the problems with the current technology and regulations like scoot did, even though we all realize that in a few years things could change.
    • hrrsn 13y ago
      One could say the same about the iPhone - http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/50104de669beddc21100000c-960/chart-of-the-day-iphone-unit-sales-july-2012.jpg http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/50104de669beddc2110... Or really any 'disruptive' product.
• flyinglizard 13y ago
  1. New LiPo batteries recharge at up to 10C (ten times their rated hourly capacity), which means a full charge under 10 minutes (including final balancing stage). 2. Octocopters, unless loaded to the hilt, can more or less fly uninterrupted even when missing a propeller. 3. Multirotors fly well even in strong winds (20mph winds and more). I don't see any technical difficulty preventing a company with the resources of Amazon to introduce this service in a year. The major problems are legislative.
  • ISL 13y ago
    And social. I'm curious what sort of utility such a service could yield, but I'm not interested in filling our airspace with service drones. The low-elevation sky is relatively uncluttered by our works.
    • flyinglizard 13y ago
      I think it can work with minor interruption to everyday life if the drone are confined to the paths of major highways. It will reduce their noise pollution (and be marginally safer in a crash). The bigger impact would be on smaller retailers, that don't have this service. This service is an absolute killer, making it faster to order a toothpaste from Amazon compared to picking it up at a shop outside your house.
      • throwaway_yy2Di 13y ago
        The bigger impact would be on smaller retailers, that don't have this service. This service is an absolute killer, making it faster to order a toothpaste from Amazon compared to picking it up at a shop outside your house. This would be an incredible benefit to human economy. Imagine the millions of retail jobs completely obsoleted by drones. Consider the price difference between wholesale and the corner retail shop -- a cost this could largely eliminate. Consider all the hours wasted in retail-facing interactions.
        • deleted 13y ago
          [deleted]
• storborg 13y ago
  I'm also "intimately familiar" with multi rotors, and I don't think any of these issues you've identified are valid, with the exception of regulations (which Amazon admits won't happen). > Battery recharge time - out for 15 mins flight? Recharge for 2 hours. So? Swap out batteries. The whole drone doesn't have to be grounded for 2 hours. > Flight time / payload - pick one. (20 mins with no payload is a stretch. Add bigger batteries? Too much weight. Add bigger motors and props for more lift? now you need bigger batteries... That's wrong. There are many off the shelf platforms which can easily handle 5+ lb payloads for 20+ minute flights. Here's one: http://www.freeflysystems.com/products/cinestarHL.php http://www.freeflysystems.com/products/cinestarHL.php > No good in 'weather' of pretty much any kind. That's wrong, too. Multirotor flight speeds are 30+ knots. Modest wind is not a big deal. > Unstable with a failed motor / prop. Will fall out of the sky under numerous failure scenarios. Most robust multirotor platforms have 8 or more motors/props, and can trivially handle the failure of one or two. It's true that there are "numerous failure scenarios" which will result in a UAV falling out of the sky, but the same is true of passenger airliners: this will happen if the wings fall off. To suggest that a UAV can't be made as reliable as a typical manned helicopter is short-sighted. > The blades are lethal - can be shielded, but will add weight and reduce efficiency. This is only true in the absence of failsafe mechanisms: e.g. a device that brakes the motor when below a certain altitude. Also, as you mentioned, they can be shielded. > GPS is unreliable at best, and is easily interfered with. No, GPS is perfectly reliable "at best", and utterly nonfunctional at worst. Fortunately, there are lots of alternatives for GPS. > Current regulations in countries that have them typically require line-of-sight operation; away from people and property (which rules out landing outside someone's front door); no over-flight of persons; restrictions around distances from the operator when taking off and landing. (And remember the battery / weight issue? Go over a certain weight [~8KG], and the regulations get even more onerous.) This is 100% valid. Regulations are a concern.
  • fosk 13y ago
    What are other good alternatives to GPS?
    • MikeCodeAwesome 13y ago
• gfodor 13y ago
  There are two ways to present this type of criticism: lay it out and hypothesize how they are going to overcome these obstacles, or get up and say they will certainly fail because these obstacles are impossible to overcome. You can guess which one of these makes you look like a short-sighted un-imaginative cynic.
• nathan_f77 13y ago
  Sounds like a lot of fun problems to solve, and I'm sure they have many competent engineers working on it.