4 ms·
Minor detail: It was misleading in the Joyent blog post, the fact that it also reads as misleading in the parent post isn't the poster's fault. When I read the
by forgottenpass 13y ago
Minor detail: It was misleading in the Joyent blog post, the fact that it also reads as misleading in the parent post isn't the poster's fault.
When I read the Joyent post, it doesn't seem like they acknowledge any other possible motivation for revert. When I later saw the revert message regarding sign-offs I was quite surprised that the blog neither mentioned it, nor was written in a way that indicated they had read it.
- sliverstorm 13y agoI'm confused as to what exactly you are saying, but I wasn't assigning fault to my parent.
- forgottenpass 13y agoI'm not saying you were. Just saying that not only is that a fire-able offense to Joylet, their post heavily implies that to be the motivation for the revert.
- sliverstorm 13y agoPerhaps it would be most clear to say they "insinuate" that was his motivation?