3 ms·

Any chance you remember where that measurement came from? I could use that with a client right now, given we're discussing a major refactor of about 25%-30% of

Any chance you remember where that measurement came from? I could use that with a client right now, given we're discussing a major refactor of about 25%-30% of the code base.

toolslive 13y ago
It was mentioned in this talk: http://vimeo.com/9270320 http://vimeo.com/9270320 and in the corresponding book "making software" http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596808303.do http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596808303.do have fun.
- asabjorn 13y ago
  Have you been able to find the Thomas et al paper that supports this claim? I have been unable to find it, and others seem to have this problem as well: http://www.gdb.me/computing/citations-greg-wilson-cusec.html http://www.gdb.me/computing/citations-greg-wilson-cusec.html
  - toolslive 13y ago
    the slides from the talk are here: http://www.slideshare.net/gvwilson/bits-of-evidence-2338367 http://www.slideshare.net/gvwilson/bits-of-evidence-2338367 (see slide 20) I realized today I got it from somewhere else.. (Facts and fallacies of Software engineering) Looking up the whole reference in that book gave me the title, and googling that gave me the the paper http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/703/2/CS-TR-3424.pdf http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/703/2/CS-TR-3424.pdf