I'm sorry, I don't see how anyone should be defending a lawyer's fees at that price. I look at law the way I look at open source software, (the law should be ac

I'm sorry, I don't see how anyone should be defending a lawyer's fees at that price. I look at law the way I look at open source software, (the law should be accessible to everyone, for free, if they know how to interpret it). You can hire experts in law, as you hire experts in open source software (lawyers/programmers). Now imagine, for example, two startups competing with on the same technology (say Rails (whatever)) in the same market (whatever). Now imagine one of the two startups wins a dominant market position and the other has to fold. You don't imagine the developers of the winning startup demanding some arbitrary fee from the company they beat. It would seem absurd. Yet here are people defending thousands of dollars an hour, for a human being to interpret the law, which is the same for everyone and should be accessible to anyone (even though we all know navigating the legal system is probably worse than navigating through WordPress source code). I don't see how a lawyer on the opposing team should be able to charge me an arbitrary amount.