3 ms·
You find it perfectly reasonable because 1) it's not you and 2) you have no idea if it is or not. I find it totally unreasonable. I think the Judge needs to be
by sigzero 13y ago
You find it perfectly reasonable because 1) it's not you and 2) you have no idea if it is or not.
I find it totally unreasonable. I think the Judge needs to be investigated for deciding the case before trial and changing the scope of the investigation.
- DannyBee 13y ago" I think the Judge needs to be investigated for deciding the case " The judge did no such thing. This has been gone over before. Judges commonly give opinions on the current strength of a case when asked by parties. This is to encourage parties to settle. IE they will often say "you may have a tough time proving X given the evidence you've submitted so far". This is an opinion on the strength of a case as it exists at the current. Not a decision about the merits. The judge had mountains of evidence and motions that had been gone through at that point. Heck, I think there were even motions for summary judgement pending (IE for a verdict before trial). What happened is perfectly normal, and not "deciding a case".
- marincounty 13y agoYou're right again. If you are the same guy who has the "Learn code the hard way", I honestly think you should run for political office. Get your name out there. You say, and think the way a lot of us feel, but are afraid to speak up.