4 ms·
It's not effective. If brakes only operated 9% of the time, would they be effective? "The current flu shot is only 9% effective for the elderly and only 56% e
by yapcguy 13y ago
It's not effective. If brakes only operated 9% of the time, would they be effective?
"The current flu shot is only 9% effective for the elderly and only 56% effective in general, according to CDC figures. CDC officials are baffled why the vaccine is so ineffective in the elderly." NYT
And from the Lancet:
"Background: No published meta-analyses have assessed efficacy and effectiveness of licensed influenza vaccines in the USA with sensitive and highly specific diagnostic tests to confirm influenza.
Findings (Interpretation): Influenza vaccines can provide moderate protection against virologically confirmed influenza, but such protection is greatly reduced or absent in some seasons. Evidence for protection in adults aged 65 years or older is lacking. LAIVs consistently show highest efficacy in young children (aged 6 months to 7 years)."
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2811%2970295-X/abstract http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-30...
Heck, if the flu vaccine is so good for you why is it that health-care workers and doctors can't be bothered to get it?
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2811%2961156-2/fulltext http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67...
- ceejayoz 13y ago> It's not effective. If brakes only operated 9% of the time, would they be effective? That's a shitty analogy. If an aftermarket add-on made old people 9% less likely to get in a car accident, and the general public 56% less likely to, I'd consider that pretty awesome. Brake failure sends you into the car in front of you. Flu shot failure means you might wind up with the flu - but if everyone else around you got their shot, you're going to be better off.