3 ms·
If you really can twist your brain into ascribing malice to those words, it's not surprising that the self-evident satire is completely lost on you. Imagine if
by sjwright 13y ago
If you really can twist your brain into ascribing malice to those words, it's not surprising that the self-evident satire is completely lost on you.
Imagine if the license chose Bill Gates as the exclusion. Would it seem more satirical to you then? If so, why? What if it were George W Bush?
- __derek__ 13y agoThe heart of satire is ridicule, so malice and satire can indeed live quite nicely side-by-side.