7 ms·
> Nimrod actually is where Python should be. I guess you meant "what I wanted Python to be". I don't see how Nimrod is a natural evolution of Python. Static t
by hcarvalhoalves 13y ago
> Nimrod actually is where Python should be.
I guess you meant "what I wanted Python to be".
I don't see how Nimrod is a natural evolution of Python. Static types and meta-programming by templates are far from anything Python proposes. I believe not even the syntax comparison applies too much, it's syntax is more reminiscent of Pascal than Python itself.
- TylerE 13y agoAs someone who has spent much of the last decade or so writing Python, I mostly disagree. The pain points I've had with python (speed, mainly) are well catered to by Nimrod. I agree that it's not "pythonic" in some ways, but the feeling is very similar. The wtfs/line ratio is very low.