2 ms·
just encode is with whatever method you choose, don't leave the list as plain text so anyone could view it and "judge" it. greatfire.org is an OK website for n
by est 13y ago
just encode is with whatever method you choose, don't leave the list as plain text so anyone could view it and "judge" it.
greatfire.org is an OK website for now, history record shows it's not that reliable. If you need any in-depth prior art take a look at Chinese researchers did at GFW Review http://gfwrev.blogspot.com/ http://gfwrev.blogspot.com/ They reversed engineered almost everything about GFW, socially and technically.
Btw also this masterpiece http://www.chinagfw.org/2009/08/gfw_30.html http://www.chinagfw.org/2009/08/gfw_30.html which triggered a man hunt and serious online crack down in China
- cholmesny 13y agoOk, I took it down. It won't be as simple as 'just encod[ing[ with whatever method', as users right now copy and paste their lists in. So this will be a step back. We need someone to code a way to add encrypted lists, and we've got several higher priority things on our plate. Hopefully someone will help out with an open source contribution.