3 ms·

He doesn't back up these statements with any evidence...

• influx 13y ago
  I agree with you, but to be fair you don't provide any to refute it.
  • smtddr 13y ago
    That's like the days of whitchhunts. You're a whitch if you can't prove otherwise. You can't be guilty unless proven innocent. If you're going to claim bitcoin is at some kind of technical-limit, you have to show it. Otherwise, it's more reasonable to believe it's working as intended.
  • trafficlight 13y ago
    Those who make the claims are obligated to support it.
  • a3voices 13y ago
    1. Bitcoin is as secure as it seems, if used properly. 2. It was never intended to be anonymous. It's pseudonymous. 3. The "computational arms race" doesn't hurt Bitcoin or alter the network performance at all. The only real negative is it wastes electricity. 4. The distributed-ledger system is not unwieldy. That's simply false.