4 ms·
yes you might be right, NIST standardized timestamping methods are themselves full of patents. And I believe Jury would accept only those + a certified authori
by diminish 13y ago
yes you might be right, NIST standardized timestamping methods are themselves full of patents. And I believe Jury would accept only those + a certified authority which would want to be testify in front of Jury.
- nl 13y agoNIST standardized timestamping methods are themselves full of patents hu? And I believe Jury would accept only those + a certified authority which would want to be testify in front of Jury. I think you've missed my point. I'm saying that the problem isn't the TIME of the prior art, it is proving to a civilian jury that prior art relates to a patent.