4 ms·
Ideally beyond the top sites, these subsets would be available as verticals, so that people can focus on specialized search engines. While it's nice to have ge
by malandrew 13y ago
Ideally beyond the top sites, these subsets would be available as verticals, so that people can focus on specialized search engines.
While it's nice to have generalist search engines, it would be even better to be able to unbundle the generalist search engines completely. Verticals such as the following would be nice:
1) Everything linux, unix and both
2) Everything open-source
3) Only news & current events
4) Popular culture globally and by country
5) Politics globally and by country
6) Everything software engineering
7) Everything hardware engineering
8) Everything maker community
9) Everything financial markets
10) Everything medicine / health (sans obvious quackery)
11) etc.
Maybe make a tool that allows the community to create the subset creation recipes that perform the parsing out of data of a certain type and that the community forks and improves over time.
The time to create a generalist search engine has sailed, but specialist search engines is total greenfield.
- nl 13y agoYou don't usually download this data - you process it on AWS to your requirements. Seriously - they give you an easy way to create these subsets yourself[1]. That is a much better solution than them trying to anticipate the exact needs of every potential client. [1] http://commoncrawl.org/get-started/ http://commoncrawl.org/get-started/
- malandrew 13y agoI guess what I was suggesting is "given enough eyeballs, all spam and poor quality content is shallow" There is definitely a benefit in using the community to identify valuable subsets and then individually putting your energy towards building discovery/search products around that subset.
- gsnedders 13y agoIs the example code still right with the new file formats for this new crawl?