The thing is the use of such a high figure means that it is actually the lack of stability that is at issue and not the deflation. Imagine we had a currency tha

The thing is the use of such a high figure means that it is actually the lack of stability that is at issue and not the deflation. Imagine we had a currency that was inflationary at a rate of 90%. Then there would be absolutely no reason for anyone to accept payment in such a currency. I t would be impossible to order materials to create widgets. Widgets would also not get made unless we had a more stable currency (or system of exchange) alongside our inflationary one. It is easy to argue that it would be the rate of movement and not the direction that causes problems in transactions.