4 ms·
Because it sucks. Its sucks even more than IDM. It sucks so hard that no sane person would listen to it. To listen to and to create algorave you need to be an
by JanezStupar 13y ago
Because it sucks. Its sucks even more than IDM. It sucks so hard that no sane person would listen to it.
To listen to and to create algorave you need to be an absolute hopeless nerd.
That much is implied by the title and it is true.
They are just creating electronic music using a horrible user interface. And its not cool.
- yid 13y agoI agree, but it's early days yet for the genre. You're looking at the Netscape of algorithmic music. Most people qualified to innovate in that algorithms space are busy writing programs to improvise jazz solos (i.e., they're generally a bit on the...older...side of electronic music).
- JanezStupar 13y agoAnd do these algorithmically improvised jazz solos sound better than what humans can do? Is it more fun to listen to than listening to a group of solid amateur performers? Moreover are amateur performers converting to the algo scene in droves? If one of the above answers is no, then my point stands and will keep standing indefinetly. As it stands I would, hands down, prefer listening to Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber over algorave.