4 ms·
Peacekeeper: http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper As I said, it's very rough, but seems to be a good indication
by ashleyw 17y ago
Peacekeeper:
http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper
As I said, it's very rough, but seems to be a good indication of where abouts browsers are in comparison to each other.
Though, once you get to a certain point (around 2x IE7, I'd say), it becomes irrelevant to 99% of what you'd want to do. Or should I say, irrelevant of what you can do, while slow browsers still have high market-shares...
- jeresig 17y agoI agree with your perception - most of the modern browsers are just fine at this point. I've been skeptical of Peacekeeper, though - the tests may be fine but it's hard to tell since they haven't released the source of them, at all. I'm not even really sure how to determine if/how improvements could be made. As far as I know, none of the major browser vendors use Peacekeeper as a benchmark for their engines (which is really what a good benchmark should strive for: to push for the improvement of the browsers that it measures).