What I don't get is that the husband went to the website and made the order, but it was the wife that made the review when the order (a gift for her) never show

What I don't get is that the husband went to the website and made the order, but it was the wife that made the review when the order (a gift for her) never showed up... So she and the company have no TOS agreement (there is no contract between them). But this is not even mentioned or used in the lawsuit? > Michelman also said that the "non-disparagement" clause was not even on the website when John Palmer placed his order in 2008. So why not get them for fraud and some other federal charges too?