Yesterday I read this report written by the Environmental Protection Agency http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/active/0/DOC062509-004.pdf http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/a

Yesterday I read this report written by the Environmental Protection Agency http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/active/0/DOC062509-004.pdf http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/active/0/DOC062509-004.pdf. In 98 pages they basically show that the science IS NOT conclusive. It may well be C02, it may not. Having worked with the EPA before, they find pretty much every excuse to ban or regulate something so when they say it is NOT doing what others say, I listen. Interestingly one of the main factors they contribute to their differing results from the IPCC report is that the IPCC report closed its paper submission windows in early 2006 even though it was published in 2007, so the work is 3 years out of date. This paper was written in the last 2 months and cites dozens of papers over the last 3 years that contradict the IPCC's "findings".