< The DSM ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manu.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manu.... ) was created by the

< The DSM ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manu.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manu.... ) was created by the psychiatric profession and psychiatry is quite different than the field of psychology. Not really. Psychiatrists and psychologists receive the same psychological training. Psychiatrists hold a medical degree, psychologists don't. Psychiatrists can prescribe drugs, psychologists cannot. In a nutshell. > Psychiatry is only useful when the person's biology is definitely out of spec and most people's aren't. Wait, what? If a person's biology is out of spec, a mental doctor is the wrong choice. The mind is not part of biology, but biology can certainly play havoc with the workings of the mind. Therefore if a biological problem is suspected, one would want to consult a real doctor, a practitioner in the biological realm. Treating a biological problem with mental therapy would be like giving a cancer patient a more comfortable pillow -- someone will surely argue that it's beneficial, but it's equally obvious that it's missing the point. Also, surely you have noticed that more and more "mental" conditions have turned out to be physical ailments with mental symptoms, yes? There will be more of those, and I predict that, in the final analysis, no purely mental illnesses will remain.