>Perhaps it's rather as the author believes in an objective reality, where there is one true valuation of a thing This just annoys me to no end. Even in an ob

>Perhaps it's rather as the author believes in an objective reality, where there is one true valuation of a thing This just annoys me to no end. Even in an objective reality, valuations are subjective; e.g. I value having a high-end computer at my home and a rink-a-dink laptop on the road, whereas some of my friends will never own a desktop again because they find no value in it. To be cliche, different strokes for different folks. There is no real valuation of anything, but simply a choice between alternatives which offer some or all of the things that someone chooses to value. What you're describing is utilitarianism.