3 ms·
> If you dislike this form of property, then you must articulate an alternative way to divest power from those who hold other forms of property I don't follow.
by dreamdu5t 13y ago
> If you dislike this form of property, then you must articulate an alternative way to divest power from those who hold other forms of property
I don't follow. Why do my arguments against intellectual property depend on some your unstated arguments against owning any property at all?
I'm left to assume you support the decision in this court case, because it's perfectly consistent with the reasoning behind copyright and patents.
- gress 13y agoYour arguments against intellectual property don't exist in a vacuum. They exist in the world where other forms of property exist and give rise to power. An argument for or against intellectual property is an argument about who and what should be accorded power. A corrupt court making a poor decision has nothing to do with the reasoning behind copyright and patents.