3 ms·

Could someone explain the logistics of Docker in a distributed app development scenario? I feel like I am on the outskirts of understanding. My goal is having

by Legion 13y ago

Could someone explain the logistics of Docker in a distributed app development scenario? I feel like I am on the outskirts of understanding. My goal is having a team of developers use Docker to have their local development environments match the production environment. The production environment should use the same Docker magic to define its environment. Is the idea that developers define their Docker environment in the Dockerfile, and then on app deployment, the production environment builds its world from the same Dockerfile? How does docker push/pull of images factor into that, if at all? Or is the idea that developers push a container, which contains the app code, up to production? What happens when a developer makes changes to his/her environment from the shell rather than scripted in the Dockerfile? What about dealing with differences in configuration between production and dev? (Eg. developers need a PostgreSQL server to develop, but on production, the Postgres host is separate from the app server - ideally running PG in a Docker container, but the point being multiple apps share a PG server rather than each running their own individual PG instance). Is the idea that in local dev, the app server and PG are in two separate Docker containers, and then in deployment, that separation allows for the segmentation of app server and PG instance? I see the puzzle pieces but I am not quite fitting them together into a cohesive understanding. Or possibly I am misunderstanding entirely.

cschmidt 13y ago
Since no one has answered you, I'll take a stab. I haven't actually used Docker yet, but I've been lurking extensively. Hopefully someone will correct me if I get this wrong. A developer will use a Dockerfile to build the main dependencies that you need, and then save an image. Then to deploy code (or other frequently changing data), you pull that base image, add or update whatever else is needed, and save it again. (You can add layers to an image as often as desired.) Then this saved image is pushed into a production environment. It seems like configuration data is often saved in images, so they require zero configuration. However, you can pass as many command line parameters as desired to run the image in production, so you can keep your configuration separated (like http://12factor.net/config http://12factor.net/config) if you want.
peterwwillis 13y ago
> Could someone explain the logistics of Docker in a distributed app development scenario? Docker lets you build an environment (read: put together a bunch of files) for you to run an app in. It also has other features, like reducing space if lots of your apps [on the same host] use the same docker images, and networking stuff. > My goal is having a team of developers use Docker to have their local development environments match the production environment You run a container. You use images to distribute files. A Dockerfile is a loose set of instructions to build the images. The basic idea is that, any single program that you want to be able to run anywhere, you make into a container. You can run it here, you can run it there, you can run it anywhere. The whole "running it anywhere" concept comes from the idea that all of your containers are created based on the same images, so no matter what kind of crazy mix of machines you have, your containers will just work - because you're literally shipping them a micro linux distribution in which to run your application. And since all the applications are running in isolated little identical containers, you can run as many of them as you want, independent of each other, in whatever configuration you want. You'll have a PSQL container and an App container, and you'll manage them separately, even if they share images - the changes they make get saved off to a temp folder so they don't impact each other. Your environment stays the same only as long as the containers and images you're using are the same. There will always be differences between development and production. You have to focus on managing those differences so you have confidence that what you're shipping to production actually works. The only thing Docker really does there is make sure the files are basically the same.

by Legion 13y ago

cschmidt 13y ago

Since no one has answered you, I'll take a stab. I haven't actually used Docker yet, but I've been lurking extensively. Hopefully someone will correct me if I get this wrong. A developer will use a Dockerfile to build the main dependencies that you need, and then save an image. Then to deploy code (or other frequently changing data), you pull that base image, add or update whatever else is needed, and save it again. (You can add layers to an image as often as desired.) Then this saved image is pushed into a production environment. It seems like configuration data is often saved in images, so they require zero configuration. However, you can pass as many command line parameters as desired to run the image in production, so you can keep your configuration separated (like http://12factor.net/config http://12factor.net/config) if you want.

peterwwillis 13y ago

> Could someone explain the logistics of Docker in a distributed app development scenario? Docker lets you build an environment (read: put together a bunch of files) for you to run an app in. It also has other features, like reducing space if lots of your apps [on the same host] use the same docker images, and networking stuff. > My goal is having a team of developers use Docker to have their local development environments match the production environment You run a container. You use images to distribute files. A Dockerfile is a loose set of instructions to build the images. The basic idea is that, any single program that you want to be able to run anywhere, you make into a container. You can run it here, you can run it there, you can run it anywhere. The whole "running it anywhere" concept comes from the idea that all of your containers are created based on the same images, so no matter what kind of crazy mix of machines you have, your containers will just work - because you're literally shipping them a micro linux distribution in which to run your application. And since all the applications are running in isolated little identical containers, you can run as many of them as you want, independent of each other, in whatever configuration you want. You'll have a PSQL container and an App container, and you'll manage them separately, even if they share images - the changes they make get saved off to a temp folder so they don't impact each other. Your environment stays the same only as long as the containers and images you're using are the same. There will always be differences between development and production. You have to focus on managing those differences so you have confidence that what you're shipping to production actually works. The only thing Docker really does there is make sure the files are basically the same.