3 ms·

I disagree, I think that opening an issue on github is a good way to start a discussion about a feature. Many projects accept feature requests this way and if a

I disagree, I think that opening an issue on github is a good way to start a discussion about a feature. Many projects accept feature requests this way and if anyone did the same for one of my projects, this would be the way I would prefer them to handle it.

felideon 13y ago
The thing is it sounds like he is just promoting his own fork he started 11 months ago, rather than "starting a discussion." > We suggest to put errbit on PG. For those who want to try - the code here: https://github.com/Undev/errbit/tree/pg-upstream https://github.com/Undev/errbit/tree/pg-upstream The problem here is that the bad English grammar could have given the wrong impression. Maybe he is just saying: "hey guys, you should consider migrating to postgresql. here's some code you can check out that has worked for us." Rather than: "hey guys, screw Errbit/MongoDB, use our fork!"
- eonil 13y ago
  It seems that latter one is far better description of how people feels.
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
- calinet6 13y ago
  ... after thouroughly testing it in production for 11 months and verifying that they had a point. This is perfectly valid. A pull req might have been better, but this starts a discussion as well, and might prompt the project owner to say "Sounds great! Submit a pull request," or alternatively, "Sounds cool! We'll provide a link to your fork on our page." Both good.