3 ms·
I may have over-read it, but I understood it as than citizen being targeted because of his presence in a third-rate country, and therefore by default a possible
by bausson 13y ago
I may have over-read it, but I understood it as than citizen being targeted because of his presence in a third-rate country, and therefore by default a possible terrorist and an affordable loose.
What is strange is the use of 'minor'. As far as I know, their is officially no caste system in the US, so no minor or major citizenship. It may also be another case of me over-reacting, 'minor' meaning in this situation 'only one'.
.
I suppose the referred story is there: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/18/opinion/the-drone-that-killed-my-grandson.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/18/opinion/the-drone-that-kil... but I don't know if it's the only time that happened. Close enough I suppose.
- entendre 13y agoAu contraire mon ami. The entendre is there. Look at the victim's age... the victim is indeed a "minor" and a second class citizen in the US.