> This suggests a strategy of bleeding out the patent trolls through their lawyers. I was depressed when I read the verdict, but your point here gives me new h

> This suggests a strategy of bleeding out the patent trolls through their lawyers. I was depressed when I read the verdict, but your point here gives me new hope. I hadn't thought about that. I wonder if they're going to hold back on their witnesses then for the appeals process as a sort of "ace in the hole?" I further have to wonder if the reason they decided not to use that witness was because they suspected they were going to lose this case and have to appeal? I can only hope that the appeals process ends up invalidating this patent.