I posted something similar in the previous HN thread where claims were made about how these jurors are the best jurors in IP cases because they're so "experienc

I posted something similar in the previous HN thread where claims were made about how these jurors are the best jurors in IP cases because they're so "experienced" and this was a slam dunk victory for Newegg. Afterall, Diffie spoke, so that seals the deal, right? My skepticism of those claims didn't go over too well. Well, I was right. I really wish people better appreciated how corrupt and broken the patent process is and how appealing to ultra-conservative districts isn't some solution. Its part of the problem. If anything, this verdict should prove that we are farther from a solution than ever. Maybe we'll have better luck with the next congress.