4 ms·
Top domains on HN by average score (warning: check comments first)
- noodle 17y agomake it public? edit: cool, it got made public.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- ii 17y agoFuck you all! Please kill my karma as much as you can, I wanna be small!
- iigs 17y agoJudging from this person's comments I would guess their account has been compromised. Upvoted. :)
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- AndrewWarner 17y agoWhat's the time frame on this?
- AndrewWarner 17y agoWhat do you guys make of this list? Love to hear your analysis.
- teej 17y agoIf you would rather not have your Google account revealed to all of HN, log out of Google before following the link.
- zackattack 17y agoSeriously. That's annoying.
- andreyf 17y agoYeah, um, or click here instead: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rC4oeGjG_04iG63oBJvy2xw&output=html http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rC4oeGjG_04iG63oBJvy2... Sorry 'bout that, was my first time publically sharing a Google spreadsheet. If an editor could update the link, it would be much appreciated! Edit: PS: Could you remove the warning from the title, also, please?
- mjgoins 17y agoCan someone explain why? I assume the link got changed a long time ago by now.
- gojomo 17y agoAt first, when you viewed the spreadsheet, you saw a richer interface that: (1) popped a little message when others started viewing, with their logged-in Google username (2) offered an expandable chat sidebar (3) showed each others' active selection-area via different selection colors (correlated with colors in the char sidebar) The warning was fair but it was actually kind of interesting. I think the best case mixing fairness-of-disclosure and options-to-viewers would be a link to the static doc, but another link on the static doc allowing upgrade to the interactive interface (perhaps with a hint of what you'll see and reveal if doing so). Dug up from my browser history, this was the original link, which reveals your logged-in Google username to other simultaneous document viewers: !!! http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rC4oeGjG_04iG63oBJvy2xw http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rC4oeGjG_04iG63oBJvy2...
- smokinn 17y agoI don't know who I was following around but it was fun just clicking under your cell selection =)
- wglb 17y agoThere seems to be some duplication further down in the list--rows fully identical are repeated.
- gojomo 17y agoSites based on the real name of their primary writer are very strong: graham, sivers, yegge, shaw, buchheit, maroon, joel, aaron, pmarca, ejohn, godin. (A message about authenticity, voice, and personal brands?) Other sites known as the outlet of a single author also do well: catonmat, daringfireball, raganwald, blogmaverick, avc.
- skolor 17y agoWhile I have no evidence to support this, I would guess this has to do with the editing process. Comparing this list to http://top.searchyc.com/domains http://top.searchyc.com/domains, you see a lot of similar results. The difference is that some of them have quite a lot of results (Techcrunch, Wired), but not nearly as high of a average score. In fact, it looks like the sites hitting the top of the list for average score are ones that are written by a single author, who has several strong opinions (ZedShaw is a good example). Since Hacker News doesn't allow down voting, it seems that by draw up a commotion, and getting people interested in a semi-controversial idea is what wins votes here.
- mattmaroon 17y agoNot surprising really. Anyone blogging under their own name (whether in the URL, or where it's blatantly obvious like Cuban or Fred Wilson) is going to put at least a little more thought into what they post. People blogging for reasons other than selling ads are going to be direct and filter out more of the "crap".
- vaksel 17y agoseems to be a lot of duplicates on that list
- gibsonf1 17y agoFor better reading: (remove-duplicates Top_news.YC_submissions :key #'first :test #'string=)
- socratees 17y agoFrom the charts I see TechCrunch.com is the domain with highest number of posts and points as well.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- yangyang 17y agoHas anyone done something like this, but grouping by (user, domain), and maybe ordering on something like (number of user submissions / number of user submissions for this domain)?
- mattmaroon 17y agoHoly crap, 95 of my articles have been submitted here? I would not have guessed that.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]