3 ms·
"blocking online sites" implies filter, does it not? Obviously they won't actually put filter in the text, that would be far too direct for a politician.
by josephagoss 13y ago
"blocking online sites" implies filter, does it not? Obviously they won't actually put filter in the text, that would be far too direct for a politician.
- ohwp 13y agoThere is a difference. A filter is a dumb blocking mechanism while blocking a specific site could involve research, warrants and so on.
- josephagoss 13y agoIt could involve "research, warrants and so on" but if the UK builds up a large enough intelligence capacity [1], Those warrants and research can be mass processed and then how is this different from a filter? It might not be dumb but it is still a filter. [1] This might not be true, but I feel that Englands intelligence capacity per capita is far greater than any other country in the world.
- vidarh 13y agoThat's not a sufficient reason for making up unsupported titles.
- Stubbs 13y agoIt could, but the title says they have done it, which they haven't.