The TOS is perfectly valid. It is a solid document advising people to take any results up with a medial professional. The service tells people that the product

The TOS is perfectly valid. It is a solid document advising people to take any results up with a medial professional. The service tells people that the product is not a medical diagnosis, however the service does provide medical information. This clearly puts said service in the realm of the FDA. Therefor compliance should be sought. Really this goes for any company building medical services. Consulting someone on HIPAA compliance, as well as, FDA standards and practices is a must. Is this fair in this case? Who knows. It is irrelevant. Resistance is futile.