3 ms·
Why's it over the top for my company to ditch NGINX because it's missing a feature that Apache httpd provides?
by jesalas 13y ago
Why's it over the top for my company to ditch NGINX because it's missing a feature that Apache httpd provides?
- _ikke_ 13y agoBecause you suggest everyone else should too.
- fit2rule 13y agoBecause you depend on a tool that you're not willing to pay for .. is it so difficult to see that you are being viewed as a bit of a scrooge, given that you will profit greatly from software you don't own and haven't paid for .. ?
- ars_technician 13y agoFirst, there is no proof of how much profit comes from nginx in a stack with PHP so you can drop the 'profit greatly' line. Second, the entire point of open source software and the FOSS movement is that you shouldn't be extorted for functionality. Do you harass people that file bug reports or submit requests for features to the Linux Kernel for not paying?
- fit2rule 13y agoAre you or are you not running a business with FOSS? It was Free: so any USE of the software that you get out of it, was profitable. What part of "this is free, so anything you do with it is profitable" do you not agree with? Second: extortion, really? Thats what you're calling this, in the same breath as admitting that you won't/can't/are unwilling to pay for software that is a key part of the production line?
- Mikeb85 13y agoThe entire point of FOSS is being able to have the source code of the software you use. Period. That's it. The people who write the software can do whatever the hell they want, as can the people using the software, as long as they abide by the licence. These are the only stipulations. Even RMS supports the right of creators to sell software. People who write FOSS software aren't required to be a charity...
- lsaferite 13y ago> People who write FOSS software aren't required to be a charity... I think this is a point so many users of FOSS miss. I'm an ardent supporter of FOSS, but I don't get to act entitled unless I'm paying someone (and probably not even then).
- JasonSage 13y agoThe over-the-top part is where you use the stigma from your story (how nginx spurned you by choosing to charge you for a particular feature, which does not seem fair to you because you need it) to try to get everybody to stop using it, when the issue is simply that it does not suit YOUR needs.
- nulagrithom 13y agoI didn't get that at all from his post. "We really need to migrate off of NGINX" sounds like 'we' is his company, not the entire world.