This is the worst argument I've ever heard. The notion that robbery only happens because the victims aren’t carrying guns is just rubbish. If the victims carry

This is the worst argument I've ever heard. The notion that robbery only happens because the victims aren’t carrying guns is just rubbish. If the victims carry guns the assailants will carry bigger guns, or possibly escalate the situation in other ways. The removal of guns is not going to stop crime and everybody knows this, it is to help reduce the fatality rate. Your argument is hardly relevant to the article I suggest you go on your pro-gun tirade where guns are the issue.