3 ms·
This is true in terms of graphics but in terms of sound, the IIGS was better. Also, the OS had some neat stuff like File System Translators - it could read and
by nevster 13y ago
This is true in terms of graphics but in terms of sound, the IIGS was better.
Also, the OS had some neat stuff like File System Translators - it could read and write all sorts of disk formats.
- vidarh 13y ago> but in terms of sound That may be so, but that's also pretty much it. Then again, for that price you could buy an Amiga 500 and a synth :D (amusingly, Ensoniq was founded by ex Commodore/MOS engineers, including Bob Yannes, who created the SID chip found in the C64) > File System Translators - it could read and write all sorts of disk formats. Just like the Amiga. There's dozens of filesystem implementations for the Amiga - you just drop a device file in the right directory, and add a very simple configuration. E.g. here's a small selection from Aminet: http://aminet.net/search?query=filesystem http://aminet.net/search?query=filesystem There's even at least one editor (FrexxEd) that exposed it's currently open buffers as files in a filesystem (so you can e.g. run your compiler directly on the editors buffer without going via a temp file, and have the compiler output go directly to another buffer, without any explicit support in the editor)