First example: of course it's complex (though I have no idea what you mean by "definitions of observations"). The correct answer needs my probability distribut

First example: of course it's complex (though I have no idea what you mean by "definitions of observations"). The correct answer needs my probability distribution over the algorithm your brain used to select which drug to send to me (my brain already hurts). Also, could you describe the Frequentist method in more detail? I'm sure it must overlook something. Second example: Okay, Bayesian statistics are harder. That's a disadvantage. --- > If you use [Bayesianism or Frequentism] correctly, they'll get you the same answer every time Wat. If they gave invariably the same answer, then, why the endless debates? By the way, here is an apparent factual disagreement bettwen Bayesianism and Frequentism: http://lesswrong.com/lw/ul/my_bayesian_enlightenment/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/ul/my_bayesian_enlightenment/