4 ms·
> But their marketing is incautious and might need to be tuned up. You're probably right. Unfortunately it's too easy to create a gap between the public-facing
by shazow 13y ago
> But their marketing is incautious and might need to be tuned up.
You're probably right. Unfortunately it's too easy to create a gap between the public-facing marketing messaging and the real spirit of the product. I can think of many companies who struggle with this.
If you do become a customer, it's evident that they perform an admirable effort to make the results appear as neutrally educational as possible. Every data interpretation is heavily cited and explained, all the while urging further clarification from a medical professional. (Let me know if you'd like some screenshots.)
Personally, this is above and beyond of what I would expect, and there are competitors (especially foreign) who do far less. I can see why the FDA would prefer to have everything that could be interpreted as medical advice to be regulated and controlled, but I'm not convinced that it would yield a net benefit to consumers in this case.