4 ms·
No, you stop advocating that the rights of innocents are violated for the sake of cases where there is evidence of fraud. Instead, advocate that cases of fraud
by wissler 13y ago
No, you stop advocating that the rights of innocents are violated for the sake of cases where there is evidence of fraud. Instead, advocate that cases of fraud are actually followed up on. Be an upstanding citizen, not part of the ignorant mob.
- anigbrowl 13y agoAre you saying there should be no culpability for negligence?
- nickff 13y agoHe is saying there should be a presumption of innocence.
- anigbrowl 13y agoThere's a presumption of innocence in fraud cases as well. I'm not proposing handing out fines in the absence of a conviction. I strongly disagree with his claim that governance by the FDA is equivalent to punishment, in fact I think it's total bullshit.
- wissler 13y agoOf course it's punishment. You have to pay an extraordinary amount of time and money under threat of violence. And even when you do comply, from then on you have to start judging whether or not the next feature you add is worth the cost of compliance. This is going to stifle innovation.